Parents Against Injustice
Family law solicitors who have clients wishing to make an application to the court in relevant family proceedings.
Practice Direction 3A and its accompanying pre-application protocol for family Mediation Information Assessment Meetings (MIAMs) will be introduced on 6 April 2011.
Under the protocol, all potential applicants, before making their application for a court order in relevant family proceedings will be expected, unless exempted, to have considered alternative means of resolving their disputes. Respondents will also be expected to attend a MIAM to consider dispute resolution options, if invited by a mediator to do so.
The protocol is designed to apply to privately paying litigants and litigants in person and is similar to the procedures for publicly funded parties contained in the Legal Services Commission's Funding Code and its associated procedures.
Practice Direction 3A applies where a person is considering applying for a court order in relevant family proceedings (See relevant proceedings in section 4).
The practice direction is supplemented by three annexes:
The purpose of this practice direction and accompanying protocol is to:
The Law Society's Family Law Protocol 2010 requires a solicitor at a first meeting to consider with their clients alternative dispute resolution options and this practice is now supported through the practice direction and its pre-application protocol.
See a copy of this practice direction (PDF).
Under the protocol all potential applicants for a court order in relevant family proceedings will be expected, before making their application to the court, to have followed the steps set out in the protocol.
The protocol requires a potential applicant, except in certain specified circumstances, to consider with a mediator whether the dispute may be capable of being resolved through alternative dispute resolution processes.
The court will expect all applicants to have complied with the protocol before commencing proceedings, subject to the exemptions set in Annex C (see Section 4), and will also expect respondents to have attended a MIAM, if invited to do so. If proceedings are issued, the court will wish to know at the first hearing whether mediation has been considered by all parties. The Family Mediation Information and Assessment Form FM1 (Form FM1) is to be filed with any application made to the court, see Section 6 below for further details.
In considering the conduct of any relevant family proceedings, the court will take into account any failure to comply with the protocol and may refer parties to a MIAM with a mediator before proceedings continue further.To comply with the protocol before an application is made to the court, you should be aware of the following:
You should ensure that your client is aware that the Legal Services Commission (LSC) is only able to remunerate for MIAMs and/or mediation services for publicly funded clients where the MIAMs and/or mediation are undertaken by LSC-contracted mediators and mediation services who are eligible to provide these services.
Where parties are not eligible or do not wish to seek public funding, any charge made by the mediator for the meeting will be the responsibility of the attending parties in accordance with any agreement made with the mediator.
Information as to which mediators and services are eligible to provide publicly funded meetings can be found at:
Relevant family proceedings are defined as:
1) Private law proceedings relating to children, except:
See Family Procedure Rule 12.2 for the definition of 'private law proceedings' and 'emergency proceedings'.
2) Proceedings for a financial remedy, except:
Your client is not expected to attend a MIAM when making an application to the court in relevant family proceedings if any of the listed circumstances applies:
Part 2 of the FM1 Form
Part 3 of the FM1 Form
Part 4 of the FM1 Form
Any other reason not specified in parts 2 or 3 of the FM1 Form and which should be set out in the form.
The new Family Mediation Information and Assessment Form FM1 is to be used in connection with family proceedings to which the Practice Direction 3A applies. When issuing proceedings the form should be completed in accordance with the protocol and filed with any application made to the court.
The form must be completed and signed by the mediator, and counter-signed by you or your client, where either:
In all other circumstances, the form must be completed and signed by you or your client.
A copy of the FM1 form will be available from 6 April from the following sources:
The FM1 form is currently unavailable at these services however a copy of the form can be found at the end of the practice direction (PDF).
Before your client makes an application to the court in relevant family proceedings, unless exempted, you or your client should contact a family mediator to arrange for your client to attend a MIAM.
The protocol does not provide a definition of family mediator, however you should ensure that any referral you make is to an appropriately qualified and experienced family mediator.
You should advise and assist clients in selecting the most suitable family mediator for the dispute in question, by reference to some or all of the following aspects:
Information on how to find a family mediator may be obtained from:
Details of the Law Society Family Mediation Panel and how to access its practitioner members can be found on the Law Society's website. There are also other organisations that offer family mediation training and accreditation, which can be located through the Family Mediation Council website.
The protocol is a supplement to part 3 of the Family Procedure Rules 2010, which comes into force on 6 April 2011.
Terms used in this practice direction and its accompanying protocol have the same meaning as those used in the Family Procedure Rules.
See the Family Procedure Rules 2010 for more information.
In private law children proceedings, the court is actively involved in assisting parties to resolve their disputes through alternative means.
The pre-application protocol does not affect the operation of the private law programme now set out in Practice Direction 12B. However, this does not mean that parties in private law children proceedings do not have to comply with the protocol and they should use Form FM1 when applying to the court.
Practice Direction 12B provides for a first hearing dispute resolution appointment to discuss the nature of the dispute and whether it could be resolved through mediation or other alternative means.
See private law programme (PDF) for further information.
Practice Advice Service - The Law Society provides support to solicitors on a wide range of areas of legal practice. The service is staffed by solicitors and can be contacted on 0870 606 2522 from 09.00 to 17.00 on weekdays.
www.lawsociety.org.uk/practiceadvice
Practice notes are issued by the Law Society as a professional body for the benefit of its members. They represent the Law Society's view of good practice in a particular area. They are not intended to be the only standard, nor do they necessarily provide a defence to complaints of misconduct or of inadequate professional service. Solicitors are not required to follow them.
They do not constitute legal advice and, while care has been taken to ensure that they are accurate, up-to-date and useful, the Law Society will not accept any legal liability in relation to them.
For queries or comments on this practice note contact the Law Society's Practice Advice Service.
Must – a specific requirement in the Solicitor's Code of Conduct or legislation. You must comply, unless there are specific exemptions or defences provided for in the code of conduct or relevant legislation.
Should – good practice for most situations in the Law Society's view. If you do not follow this, you must be able to justify to oversight bodies why this is appropriate, either for your practice, or in the particular retainer.
May – a non-exhaustive list of options for meeting your obligations. Which option you choose is determined by the risk profile of the individual practice, client or retainer. You must be able to justify why this was an appropriate option to oversight bodies.
The Law Society wishes to thank members of the Family Law Committee for their assistance in drafting this practice note.
© 2025 Created by Alison J Stevens. Powered by
You need to be a member of Parents Against Injustice to add comments!
Join Parents Against Injustice